Constellation Software just disclosed a 3.16% stake in Accesso Technology, a £97 million UK leisure-tech company trading near five-year lows.

That does not make Accesso a buy. But it does make the question more interesting.

Why is one of the best software capital allocators in the world looking at a business the market appears to have given up on?

Accesso is not just a small ticketing vendor. It is embedded operating infrastructure for leisure venues, ticketing, payments, queuing, POS, mobile commerce, and analytics, used across more than 1,100 locations globally.

It has repeatable revenue, transaction-linked economics, a net cash balance sheet, aligned management, and a model that could scale better as hardware fades, payments expand, and AI is layered across the platform. Constellation Software’s disclosed stake adds another reason to look closely.

But none of that makes Accesso an automatic buy.

The market has real concerns: weak long-term shareholder returns, customer concentration, exposure to discretionary attendance, weather risk, and the possibility that this remains a good business without becoming a great investment.

That is where the real work starts.

In the paid section, I walk through what Accesso is worth, the bear/base/bull valuation cases, how much weight I place on Constellation’s stake, which risks matter most, and my final judgment on whether this is a stock to buy, watch, or avoid.

Subscribe now

Read more

Topicus is down roughly 40% from its highs because the market is asking one question:

What if AI destroys the economics of software?

That is the right question.

But I think investors are applying the right fear to the wrong kind of business.

Topicus is not a generic software company. It owns mission-critical vertical software businesses across fragmented European markets — where customers face extreme switching costs, local regulation protects incumbents, and free cash flow can be redeployed into a long acquisition runway.

That explains the quality.

But quality alone is not the argument.

The real question is whether the current share price already reflects the risks — especially AI disruption, larger acquisitions, and the possibility that Topicus cannot keep compounding at historical rates.

In the paid section, I’ll break down what the market is currently pricing in, run the valuation scenarios, stress-test the AI risk, and give my final investment judgment on whether Topicus is attractive today or still needs a wider margin of safety.

Subscribe now

Read more

Wix stock has fallen sharply because the market believes AI website builders will destroy the business — but that view may badly misunderstand what Wix has become.

Wix has 304 million users, $1.9 billion in ARR, and a core platform generating over $500 million in free cash flow annually.

Yet the stock is down 62% year-over-year. Meanwhile, Wix has built Harmony, its own proprietary LLM that can create sites at roughly 5% of the cost of third-party alternatives.

And Base44, acquired for $80 million in mid-2025, has reportedly reached around $150 million in ARR by May 2026 — a fast-growing AI app builder that the market appears to be valuing at close to zero inside Wix.

Management has already retired 30% of shares outstanding and authorized another $2 billion buyback. That raises a simple question: is Wix becoming what Mohnish Pabrai would call a cannibal stock — a business quietly eating itself while the market looks the other way?

What’s in the paid section:

The paid section walks through the valuation: the DCF, assumptions, bear case, fair value range, and the risks that matter — debt, competition, geopolitical exposure, and execution.

It also answers the only question that matters in the end: whether the risk/reward is compelling enough to act on, and at what size.

Read more

£10,000 invested in Goodwin in 1992 would be worth £9.3 million today.

From a Stoke-on-Trent foundry making submarine castings, nuclear waste containers, and airport radar systems.

Then, in March 2026, the shares fell 51% in three months.

Not because the family sold or the moat disappeared.

Goodwin lost two significant tenders:

• Easat lost an €18m Estonia coastal radar contract.

• Goodwin International lost a Sellafield tender worth over £45m.

• LNG valve orders in the Middle East and USA have not been cancelled, but some Middle East dispatches have been delayed due to geopolitical conditions.

• Refractory Engineering remains weak, partly because high gold and silver prices are hurting jewellery casting demand.

• Duvelco / Ducoya, the advanced plastics opportunity, has still made no commercial sales. Initial sales may come in FY2027, but contributions are not expected to be substantial early on.

• The board may revert to a more cautious dividend policy.

Goodwin went from over 50x earnings to a stock currently facing high uncertainty.

Which raises the only question that matters right now: is this a reset buying opportunity, or a warning sign about a compounder that overstepped?

I’ve spent weeks stress-testing the thesis — the moat, the customer relationships, the balance sheet, the valuation, and the two growth options the market is currently pricing at zero.

The Goodwin family owns 54% of this business. No LTIPs. No bonus games. Just salary and a share price. When it fell 51%, they felt it the same as you. That kind of alignment is almost impossible to find.

The long-term DNA is exceptional. The recent execution is not. And the full picture is more nuanced — and more interesting — than the trading update alone suggests.

Here’s what paid subscribers get:

The full 15-part deep dive, including the moat stress-test, the customer compact breakdown, the capital allocation scorecard, a reverse DCF valuation, and my final verdict on whether I’m holding, adding, or walking away — and exactly what would change my mind.

This takes weeks to build. Subscribers get it every week.

If you’re serious about finding great compounders before the crowd, this is where the work gets done.

Read more

Name: Plover Bay Technologies Limited

Size: HK$10.1 billion (US$1.3 billion)

Industry: Networking Hardware & SD-WAN / Connectivity-as-a-Service

Average Volume: 1.2 million shares

Price: HK$8.78 per share

Range (12m): HK$5.49 - HK$9.28

Stock Exchange: 1523 (HKEX Main Board)

Founded: 2006 by Alex Chan

I am initiating coverage on Plover Bay Technologies (1523.HK) today, May 18, 2026, with shares trading at HK$8.78.

The stock is up 41%+ in twelve months off a HK$6.20 low, driven by accelerating recurring revenue, a deepening Starlink partnership, and the February 2026 announcement of a NASDAQ spinoff of the Peplink North American business.

Now the real question: buy before the spin, or wait for the dust to settle?

Plover Bay is a founder-led connectivity platform with a singular focus:

To make connectivity more reliable, faster, and more usable across all environments and use cases.

Global enterprise SD-WAN spend is projected to reach $14–16 billion by 2030.

Starlink has tripled its customer base in 18 months — every enterprise terminal needs a router behind it.

Plover Bay (Peplink) is the first authorized Starlink Technology Provider in the world.

Edge computing, teleoperation, autonomy, smart cities, and transportation all need resilient connectivity.

Plover Bay: Core investment thesis

• Founder alignment remains strong. Alex Chan still controls roughly 68% of Plover Bay, a stake worth more than US$831 million. He is stepping back to non-executive chairman at the Hong Kong RemainCo to chair the new NASDAQ SpinCo, taking CEO Keith Chau with him. This does not look like founders cashing out. It looks like founders concentrating their best operators on the part of the business they believe can re-rate hardest and create the most value for shareholders.

• The Starlink advantage should widen. Starlink drives demand for satellite connectivity, but it alone does not provide enterprise-grade resilience. Serious customers still need bonding, failover, routing, security, cellular backup, API integration, and centralized management. Peplink is the first authorized Starlink Technology Provider, with API-level integration and certification across Starlink Business and Maritime SKUs. My view is straightforward: every serious enterprise Starlink deployment can become a Peplink opportunity.

The key question now is not whether Plover Bay is a great business. The numbers prove it is.

Plover Bay’s share price has been a formidable long-term compounder, rising approximately 1,692% since July 2016 at a 34.7% CAGR.

It is whether the stock still offers enough upside after a 43% year-to-date move — and whether the NASDAQ spinoff, scheduled to close before the end of 2026, is a re-rating catalyst or already priced in.

That is what I break down below, where I stress-test the thesis.

The full 15-section deep dive, valuation analysis, and investment conclusion are below for paid subscribers.

Subscribe now

Read more